lewion
Sep 12, 11:39 AM
I just got off a plane in Atlanta waiting for my connection so I paid the $6 to get wireless internet on my laptop just so I can see what the announcements are. Steve better make it worth my while!
hehe
hehe
KindredMAC
Jul 12, 07:09 PM
Jeez Apple.... you think that maybe the current lowest end iMac might be a little rich for everyone's blood? Sure sign of that is if everyone if buying the $899 model even though it is missing a SuperDrive and Front Row.
I think Apple should use this occurance as good solid info that people will just eat up the iMac if it is priced a tad cheaper.
In the next revisions, why not offer:
$999
17" 1.83 GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
160GB HD
Combo Drive
ATI Radeon X1600 w/ 128MB
APE + BT 2.0
$1299
17" 2 GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
160GB HD
Super Drive
ATI Radeon X1600 w/128MB
APE + BT 2.0
$1499
20" 2.16 GHz Intel Core Duo
1GB Ram
250GB HD
Super Drive
ATI Radeon X1600 w/ 256MB
APE + BT 2.0
Then I would say lower the Mac Mini's to the following:
$399
1.66GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
60GB HD
Combo Drive
APE + BT 2.0
$599
1.83GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
80GB HD
Super Drive
APE + BT 2.0
I would go with the risky $399 price point because with those specs you would be selling a throw away computer at that point. The 1.66GHz chip is already dated and it would be perfect for someone who doesn't know a heck of a lot about Apple. That way they aren't feeling like they are spending a "fortune" for something they are unfamiliar with. Plus once they have been bitten by the "Mac Bug", they will be more likely to go for the bigger and better models on their next purchase in 1-3 years.
I think Apple should use this occurance as good solid info that people will just eat up the iMac if it is priced a tad cheaper.
In the next revisions, why not offer:
$999
17" 1.83 GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
160GB HD
Combo Drive
ATI Radeon X1600 w/ 128MB
APE + BT 2.0
$1299
17" 2 GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
160GB HD
Super Drive
ATI Radeon X1600 w/128MB
APE + BT 2.0
$1499
20" 2.16 GHz Intel Core Duo
1GB Ram
250GB HD
Super Drive
ATI Radeon X1600 w/ 256MB
APE + BT 2.0
Then I would say lower the Mac Mini's to the following:
$399
1.66GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
60GB HD
Combo Drive
APE + BT 2.0
$599
1.83GHz Intel Core Duo
512 MB Ram
80GB HD
Super Drive
APE + BT 2.0
I would go with the risky $399 price point because with those specs you would be selling a throw away computer at that point. The 1.66GHz chip is already dated and it would be perfect for someone who doesn't know a heck of a lot about Apple. That way they aren't feeling like they are spending a "fortune" for something they are unfamiliar with. Plus once they have been bitten by the "Mac Bug", they will be more likely to go for the bigger and better models on their next purchase in 1-3 years.
Lord Blackadder
Dec 3, 03:19 PM
Not to mention anything of the Sequoia, FJ Cruiser, 4Runner, Land Cruiser, Armada, Pathfinder, GX460, LX570, QX56. Why do the Asian companies always get a free pass on their giant offerings? They want in on that party just as much as any of the Big Three. In fact, I'd say Toyota is trying way harder than any of the big three brands, with 6 distinct SUV offerings (rav4, fj, highlander, 4runner, sequoia, land cruiser).
Domestic truck sales dwarf those of the Japanese, but you have a point. I'm not giving them a "free pass". Perhaps Toyota's increasing concentration on SUVs and the Prius has something to do with their worsening circumstances.
But the fact of the matter remains: the Japanese car manufacturers do not survive solely based on their truck sales - but the Big Three absolutely rely on strong truck sales to stay in business.
Domestic truck sales dwarf those of the Japanese, but you have a point. I'm not giving them a "free pass". Perhaps Toyota's increasing concentration on SUVs and the Prius has something to do with their worsening circumstances.
But the fact of the matter remains: the Japanese car manufacturers do not survive solely based on their truck sales - but the Big Three absolutely rely on strong truck sales to stay in business.
Winni
Apr 29, 09:45 AM
iPhones don't cost any more than other smart phones, so I don't see why you find this surprising. If you need a phone, might as well get the best.
I don't know where you get your prices from, but when you look on Amazon.de or even eBay, you'll quickly find that the iPhone 4 is twice as expensive as the comparable Samsung Galaxy SI9000 or Samsung Nexus S and it is still more than 200 Euros more expensive than the LG Optimus Speed - which already has superior technical specifications, e.g. a dual core CPU.
So, no. The iPhone does cost more than other smart phones and no, it certainly is NOT the best anymore. Maybe it's the one that you like best, but that only has something to do with personal preferences. From a pure technological aspect, the competition is giving Apple a run for their money - and there are already more Android-based phones being sold than iPhones. So obviously, the competition is also doing something right and the customers are discovering that other mothers also have beautiful daughters.
I don't know where you get your prices from, but when you look on Amazon.de or even eBay, you'll quickly find that the iPhone 4 is twice as expensive as the comparable Samsung Galaxy SI9000 or Samsung Nexus S and it is still more than 200 Euros more expensive than the LG Optimus Speed - which already has superior technical specifications, e.g. a dual core CPU.
So, no. The iPhone does cost more than other smart phones and no, it certainly is NOT the best anymore. Maybe it's the one that you like best, but that only has something to do with personal preferences. From a pure technological aspect, the competition is giving Apple a run for their money - and there are already more Android-based phones being sold than iPhones. So obviously, the competition is also doing something right and the customers are discovering that other mothers also have beautiful daughters.
utazdevl
Sep 29, 07:49 PM
Yes. Works fine.
I keep getting the "Router Incompatible" message. Any tips?
I keep getting the "Router Incompatible" message. Any tips?
Mr. Wonderful
Apr 19, 10:36 AM
Anyone try it yet on a 6490M yet? I have the PS3 version coming today, so I'll test it myself if nobody posts by then.
TannerH
Apr 5, 08:47 PM
That Is So Sad!
exabytes18
Jul 11, 04:22 PM
I had a laptop with a magnesium alloy case back in the days before I became a Mac Convert. It was a Sony VAIO 505-TR, and was a very nice light machine. One of the benefits of the magnesium case over the aluminium Powerbook case is the magnesium case never corroded like my 12" PB case has.
I think your iBook has a magnesium frame.
Magnesium tanishes, but I believe it is like aluminum and practically transparent. As for the flammability, you have got to be really trying to ignite it. Your iPod is not just going spontaneously light on fire.
I think your iBook has a magnesium frame.
Magnesium tanishes, but I believe it is like aluminum and practically transparent. As for the flammability, you have got to be really trying to ignite it. Your iPod is not just going spontaneously light on fire.
Stella
Apr 9, 08:39 PM
This guy and his company are freaking really stupid. Don't buy a blender from them, let's all boycot them.
I hope that this guy looses his job, and I hope that this company goes out of business. Take the thousands of dollars that they they have spent destroying perfectly good stuff and donate to someone that has dreams of being able to afford one of these!
Just stupid. I hope that mac rumors pulls this whole thead down!
This guy actually owns the company apparently, according to other posters, and they blend quite a lot of devices, so he's not going anywhere, so don't worry about that!
Its not stupid, its actually very good advertising - and Macrumours has given them plenty! They got free advertisements from quite a lot of websites due to this one advert!
When I buy a blender I want to make sure it doesn't choke on an egg, so this advert goes a long way to show that these Blenders have the power necessary.
I hope that this guy looses his job, and I hope that this company goes out of business. Take the thousands of dollars that they they have spent destroying perfectly good stuff and donate to someone that has dreams of being able to afford one of these!
Just stupid. I hope that mac rumors pulls this whole thead down!
This guy actually owns the company apparently, according to other posters, and they blend quite a lot of devices, so he's not going anywhere, so don't worry about that!
Its not stupid, its actually very good advertising - and Macrumours has given them plenty! They got free advertisements from quite a lot of websites due to this one advert!
When I buy a blender I want to make sure it doesn't choke on an egg, so this advert goes a long way to show that these Blenders have the power necessary.
p0intblank
Oct 12, 09:26 PM
Every update is another step closer to Leopard's release. :D
kas23
Apr 17, 08:28 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2 like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C134 Safari/6533.18.5)
A little off topic here, but I would like to add a comment about the white iPhone 4. Sounds like a cool idea, but don't put a clear case on it. I have a clear case and tons of crap builds up between the case and the phone. This would look absolutely horrific and disgusting with a white background.
A little off topic here, but I would like to add a comment about the white iPhone 4. Sounds like a cool idea, but don't put a clear case on it. I have a clear case and tons of crap builds up between the case and the phone. This would look absolutely horrific and disgusting with a white background.
AlBDamned
Sep 12, 12:13 PM
Gapless playback is good news but oh dear, if new iPod "games" are the level of announcements - even at the beginning - then this is going to be a big, big disappointment of a keynote for some people... :p
gkarris
Apr 11, 05:03 PM
They did this with the Nintendo DSi back in 2009.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5QSclrIdlE&feature=player_embedded
The game is available in the DSi Ware Store (called Looksley's Line Up). It�s quite funny because the changing of the perspective will reveal the solutions to each diorama and the effect is done quite well.
Back then when Nintendo announced that their next iteration would feature 3d I just thought that they would implement this form of "pseudo" 3d in every game. The problem in real life: You only get the 3d effect when you move your head or your device - So it�s the totally opposite concept of the stereoscopic screens like in the 3ds or some new android phones where you can only see the effect when you look straight on the device! You have to experience both - Funny thing: You can download the DSi game on the 3DS and play it there and afterwards some 3DS 3d game to really get the idea how the two techniques behave in real life. Obviously both have their advantages!
What would be impressive is some combination of the two: "Real" 3D imaging like on the 3ds combined with headtracking..
EDIT: Some of the problems with Jonny Lees awesome concepts: You can only do it alone, the effect doesn�t work if more people are staring at the tv, and it isn�t possible with movies it�s only possible with real time rendered objects! As you can see the stadium at the end is totally flat, as opposed to how the stadium would look like with glasses and shot with a 3d camera.
But after getting my 3ds last week (together with PES 2011) I have to conclude that the 3d of the 3ds is better and more impressive even though my eyes start to hurt after playing for an hour or so..
Because they achieved this game with the DSi (133 Mhz ARM) I don�t think that it taxes the cpu very much..
Because of on-screen motion during gameplay, is that why Nintendo when with the Lenticular Lenses?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostereoscopy
I'm wondering how this head-tracking technology would work in-game...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5QSclrIdlE&feature=player_embedded
The game is available in the DSi Ware Store (called Looksley's Line Up). It�s quite funny because the changing of the perspective will reveal the solutions to each diorama and the effect is done quite well.
Back then when Nintendo announced that their next iteration would feature 3d I just thought that they would implement this form of "pseudo" 3d in every game. The problem in real life: You only get the 3d effect when you move your head or your device - So it�s the totally opposite concept of the stereoscopic screens like in the 3ds or some new android phones where you can only see the effect when you look straight on the device! You have to experience both - Funny thing: You can download the DSi game on the 3DS and play it there and afterwards some 3DS 3d game to really get the idea how the two techniques behave in real life. Obviously both have their advantages!
What would be impressive is some combination of the two: "Real" 3D imaging like on the 3ds combined with headtracking..
EDIT: Some of the problems with Jonny Lees awesome concepts: You can only do it alone, the effect doesn�t work if more people are staring at the tv, and it isn�t possible with movies it�s only possible with real time rendered objects! As you can see the stadium at the end is totally flat, as opposed to how the stadium would look like with glasses and shot with a 3d camera.
But after getting my 3ds last week (together with PES 2011) I have to conclude that the 3d of the 3ds is better and more impressive even though my eyes start to hurt after playing for an hour or so..
Because they achieved this game with the DSi (133 Mhz ARM) I don�t think that it taxes the cpu very much..
Because of on-screen motion during gameplay, is that why Nintendo when with the Lenticular Lenses?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostereoscopy
I'm wondering how this head-tracking technology would work in-game...
malohkan
May 4, 12:57 PM
im hoping this quietly fixes the unresponsive home button issue.
Last time I had an unresponsive home button, I took it into the Apple store, they said "oh you have a hairline crack right here, see it?" I said, "no" because it was too small to see, but then they handed me a brand new phone to replace it for free. Solved my problem :)
Last time I had an unresponsive home button, I took it into the Apple store, they said "oh you have a hairline crack right here, see it?" I said, "no" because it was too small to see, but then they handed me a brand new phone to replace it for free. Solved my problem :)
neildmitchell
Sep 9, 08:39 PM
didnt like the advice from my guy huh? :mad:
just playing around... hope it heals well, and just try to keep it clean, but don't obsess of the cleanliness, otherwise it will take too long to heal. man its going to be a pain to keep my industrial from getting infected LOL, those are the worst. btw, any blood or puss or green oozing crap? dont worry about any of that, its normal and healthy. :)
Ill be investing in the 3M ?gauze?, great advice
"any blood or puss or green oozing crap? dont worry about any of that, its normal and healthy."
to a point, yes sure it is normal, but it reminds me of when I first got my ears pierced when I was in the 6th grade, my lobes got totlly infected. It was completely nasty!
love quotes tagalog part 1
tagalog love quotes 2.
LOVE quotes tumblr tagalog
love quotes tagalog. love
just playing around... hope it heals well, and just try to keep it clean, but don't obsess of the cleanliness, otherwise it will take too long to heal. man its going to be a pain to keep my industrial from getting infected LOL, those are the worst. btw, any blood or puss or green oozing crap? dont worry about any of that, its normal and healthy. :)
Ill be investing in the 3M ?gauze?, great advice
"any blood or puss or green oozing crap? dont worry about any of that, its normal and healthy."
to a point, yes sure it is normal, but it reminds me of when I first got my ears pierced when I was in the 6th grade, my lobes got totlly infected. It was completely nasty!
toddybody
Apr 18, 08:50 AM
Been waiting for a white iPhone 4 since day one. So glad that it will finally be released. Can't figure out why everyone here seems to hate on it.
Me neither, I think they look gorgeous :)
Me neither, I think they look gorgeous :)
nefan65
May 4, 08:08 PM
People on these boards never cease to amaze me. First, they complain that there aren't enough update. When are the updates? We need more!!! Then they release them, and people complain. What's with all the updates?! Why is the update so big?! Apple is horrible...I'm switching...!!!
WOW...Just amazing. I'd hate to be living in your houses! :D
WOW...Just amazing. I'd hate to be living in your houses! :D
MacRumors
Nov 13, 06:32 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)
Apple released a number of updates today for Intel Macs, RAW Camera support and X11:
Apple released firmware updates for all of the Intel Macs:
• iMac EFI Firmware Update 1.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/imacefifirmwareupdate11.html)
• MacBook Pro EFI Firmware Update 1.2 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macbookproefifirmwareupdate12.html)
• MacBook EFI Firmware Update 1.0 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macbookefifirmwareupdate10.html)
• Mac mini EFI Firmware Update 1.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macminiefifirmwareupdate11.html)
• Mac Pro EFI Firmware Update 1.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macproefifirmwareupdate11.html)
The updates provide fixes for Boot Camp, start up, and wake-from-sleep issues on all computers listed.
Apple also posted minor updates to Digital Camera RAW Support Update 1.0.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/digitalcamerarawsupportupdate101universal.html) and X11 Update 2006 1.1.3 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/x11update2006113.html)
Apple released a number of updates today for Intel Macs, RAW Camera support and X11:
Apple released firmware updates for all of the Intel Macs:
• iMac EFI Firmware Update 1.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/imacefifirmwareupdate11.html)
• MacBook Pro EFI Firmware Update 1.2 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macbookproefifirmwareupdate12.html)
• MacBook EFI Firmware Update 1.0 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macbookefifirmwareupdate10.html)
• Mac mini EFI Firmware Update 1.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macminiefifirmwareupdate11.html)
• Mac Pro EFI Firmware Update 1.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macproefifirmwareupdate11.html)
The updates provide fixes for Boot Camp, start up, and wake-from-sleep issues on all computers listed.
Apple also posted minor updates to Digital Camera RAW Support Update 1.0.1 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/digitalcamerarawsupportupdate101universal.html) and X11 Update 2006 1.1.3 (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/x11update2006113.html)
kdarling
Mar 29, 07:30 PM
True that they can do it but the original question remains. Why did Nokia wait until now before doing it ?
Who knows.
Why did Apple take two years before they sued HTC? Did it take them that long to figure it out? Did they wait until HTC became a threat? All of the above?
Now my final question would be, is it possible Apple could file suit against BOTH Microsoft and Nokia when the Windows Phone 7 Nokia phones come out? I mean, Steve Jobs said it himself that Apple had patented the iPhone to the hilt and intended to protect all those patents.
Jobs is a showman, not an engineer. Many of his remarks should not be taken at face value.
There's not a lot in the iPhone that's patented by Apple. I can think of about four "major" items offhand: their particular touchscreen position decoder, their slot antenna using the case trim, their way of implementing a scrolling direction lock, and their way of doing a bounce at the end of a page. Oh, and their way of doing a slide-to-unlock.
You can certainly make a nice smartphone without any of the above. I cannot think of a way for Apple to make a GSM phone without using GSM patents.
As I remember when this first came out, Nokia wanted both money and access to Apple's patent portfolio. Apple did not want to give Nokia access to Apple's patent portfolio and wanted to pay Nokia less money (Note - Nokia wanted to get a percentage of each phone sold (lot of money for a smart phone) while Apple wanted to give a lesser fixed amount).
The original royalty for GSM phones was a percentage of the retail price. The GSM inventors came up with that plan as a way of promoting phones that everyone in the world could afford. (Something that Apple isn't at all interested in. They just want to use the technology and infrastructure that other companies spent billions on, to make their own billions in high profits.)
Many companies also shared a patent pool, and those that did got a better royalty deal of course.
Nokia offered royalty plans both with and without patent sharing. However, Apple doesn't like to share patents, and they felt that all the proposed payments were too high.
So Nokia has asked a jury in Delaware to decide the amount. You can't get much more fair than that.
Who knows.
Why did Apple take two years before they sued HTC? Did it take them that long to figure it out? Did they wait until HTC became a threat? All of the above?
Now my final question would be, is it possible Apple could file suit against BOTH Microsoft and Nokia when the Windows Phone 7 Nokia phones come out? I mean, Steve Jobs said it himself that Apple had patented the iPhone to the hilt and intended to protect all those patents.
Jobs is a showman, not an engineer. Many of his remarks should not be taken at face value.
There's not a lot in the iPhone that's patented by Apple. I can think of about four "major" items offhand: their particular touchscreen position decoder, their slot antenna using the case trim, their way of implementing a scrolling direction lock, and their way of doing a bounce at the end of a page. Oh, and their way of doing a slide-to-unlock.
You can certainly make a nice smartphone without any of the above. I cannot think of a way for Apple to make a GSM phone without using GSM patents.
As I remember when this first came out, Nokia wanted both money and access to Apple's patent portfolio. Apple did not want to give Nokia access to Apple's patent portfolio and wanted to pay Nokia less money (Note - Nokia wanted to get a percentage of each phone sold (lot of money for a smart phone) while Apple wanted to give a lesser fixed amount).
The original royalty for GSM phones was a percentage of the retail price. The GSM inventors came up with that plan as a way of promoting phones that everyone in the world could afford. (Something that Apple isn't at all interested in. They just want to use the technology and infrastructure that other companies spent billions on, to make their own billions in high profits.)
Many companies also shared a patent pool, and those that did got a better royalty deal of course.
Nokia offered royalty plans both with and without patent sharing. However, Apple doesn't like to share patents, and they felt that all the proposed payments were too high.
So Nokia has asked a jury in Delaware to decide the amount. You can't get much more fair than that.
to1986
Apr 21, 03:28 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8H7)
This is getting exciting.
The billion dollar question: just content purchased from iTunes or all compatible (audio) files in one's iTunes library?
Get real, no way are the music labels going to allow them to do this unless they limit it to music purchased from iTunes.
This is getting exciting.
The billion dollar question: just content purchased from iTunes or all compatible (audio) files in one's iTunes library?
Get real, no way are the music labels going to allow them to do this unless they limit it to music purchased from iTunes.
nikole957
Nov 28, 10:18 PM
Super basic.
Better exception handling in Finder.
When you copy files and some already exist, rather than terminating the action with no clue what was the hold-up, complete it with a list of exceptions for dealing with as a separate matter.
There are other examples of where exception handling could be added.
Think of all the features we had under text based computers that were LOST when we went to graphical based computers, and reinstall them.
Even though many of the files are media, their names are text. :D
Funny suggestion: Finder personalities.
OS 4.2
OS 8.6
1dir
VMS
Rocketman
Yeah I like the vertical traffic lights too. Makes the top border smaller which is good. It helps by not taking as much pixels for the top border.
Better exception handling in Finder.
When you copy files and some already exist, rather than terminating the action with no clue what was the hold-up, complete it with a list of exceptions for dealing with as a separate matter.
There are other examples of where exception handling could be added.
Think of all the features we had under text based computers that were LOST when we went to graphical based computers, and reinstall them.
Even though many of the files are media, their names are text. :D
Funny suggestion: Finder personalities.
OS 4.2
OS 8.6
1dir
VMS
Rocketman
Yeah I like the vertical traffic lights too. Makes the top border smaller which is good. It helps by not taking as much pixels for the top border.
jfanning
Mar 31, 02:46 AM
Nokia is suing SEVEN CELL PHONE MANUFACTURERS!
Do a search on "Nokia Price Fixing" and see why Nokia is sueing a number of those companies.
Do a search on "Nokia Price Fixing" and see why Nokia is sueing a number of those companies.
mrzippy
Nov 14, 08:11 AM
Interesting I have been experiencing a startup bug on my 20" Core 2 iMac, basically on cold boots I get the startup manager (as if option pressed) on virtually every boot. Shame Apple is not more specific about the startup issues that have been fixed.
Currently my machine is at an Apple authorized service center to try and sort out my startup problem, so far they cannot reproduce.... So this puts it down to maybe a USB device causing it to think option has been pressed, very odd and might land me with a repair bill if they cannot reproduce.
If you have any suggestions please see my thread on Apples forums for full details.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=705283
Currently my machine is at an Apple authorized service center to try and sort out my startup problem, so far they cannot reproduce.... So this puts it down to maybe a USB device causing it to think option has been pressed, very odd and might land me with a repair bill if they cannot reproduce.
If you have any suggestions please see my thread on Apples forums for full details.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=705283
donlphi
Nov 17, 11:16 AM
As a music teacher, I think it would be a great development, but unfortunately, I don't think it would be beneficial to anybody but "Garage Bandies", and even then, I don't think it would be very useful. I would still need the full function of my regular keyboard while doing these other things.
I can't imagine have something that would truly be configurable and useful. I'm sure it would work with Garage Band and if it worked for another program, then great. The keyboard would have to be compatible with Finale and Sibelius if it was going to make an impact on the music education or composition world.
I think this is just another PATENT... don't hold your breath for this one.
I can't imagine have something that would truly be configurable and useful. I'm sure it would work with Garage Band and if it worked for another program, then great. The keyboard would have to be compatible with Finale and Sibelius if it was going to make an impact on the music education or composition world.
I think this is just another PATENT... don't hold your breath for this one.
No comments:
Post a Comment