Friday, May 20, 2011

ipod touch 2g and 3g difference

ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. 3G and iPod Touch 2G (MB
  • 3G and iPod Touch 2G (MB



  • BlizzardBomb
    Jul 14, 03:40 PM
    512MB RAM on low-end and an X1800 Pro on high-end. I must admit, I'm a little disappointed if this is true.

    EDIT: MacRumors lists as X1800 Pro, AppleInsider says X1800 GTO.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. EcoShield for iPod touch 2G/3G
  • EcoShield for iPod touch 2G/3G



  • starnox
    Aug 5, 04:51 PM
    Can someone confirm my calculations?

    The keynote will start 8PM UK time?





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. 3G and iPod Touch 2G with
  • 3G and iPod Touch 2G with



  • mhagerman
    Nov 29, 08:22 AM
    maybe this was the real reason that MS made the Zune.. just so they could set the standard for future Universal deals. I don't see it doing anything else, other than squirting...

    I don't think Universal realizes how many people don't pirate music. On the other hand, I don't think they understand how ridiculously easy it would be for everyone who actually pays for music to go download it illegally and then some. They will end up losing far more than they gain with this one if it's implicated.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. Jailbreak iPod Touch 2G/3G
  • Jailbreak iPod Touch 2G/3G



  • FlameofAnor
    Mar 31, 05:23 PM
    You could say the same thing about Apple though. The Apple fad will go away and the extremely closed ecosystem which seems to not be really developing much in terms of UI or having an actual roadmap could end iOS.

    I don't understand why people can't just see the pros and cons of both and accept both are great platforms. Its always a WAR with Apple fans. Apple against EVERYONE!

    Really? :confused:

    I always perceived it as everyone against Apple. Just read the comments on any tech site anytime Apple launches a new product. "This has fail written all over it".... "only iSheep will buy this crap"...... blah, blah, blah.

    The amount of people who never bought an Apple product, but will still log-on to blast away at anything Apple is really quite amusing. ;)





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. 2G 3G 3GS 4G iPod Touch 2G
  • 2G 3G 3GS 4G iPod Touch 2G



  • iGary
    Aug 11, 11:19 AM
    I've been looking at the Treo, but they're not easy to come by for Vodafone contract, if at all.

    And they suck - I had a 600, which fell into the water and was replaced by insurance with a 650, which is only marginally better.

    I don't believe the rumor - Steve wouldn't blab, he just wouldn't.

    We only have a month to wait, though. :)





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. 2G 3G 3GS 4G iPod Touch 2G
  • 2G 3G 3GS 4G iPod Touch 2G



  • citizenzen
    Mar 23, 12:15 PM
    ... the leftist side of the antiwar movement is all but gone, but not because the policies have changed, only because the man has changed.

    If you listen to enough leftists you'll find plenty of people like me who question our involvement in Libya. However, to claim the policies are the same as Iraq ignores the very real fact that the United Nations Security Council approved this action.

    While that lends credence to the notion that this isn't simply another example of American imperialism at work, it still isn't sufficient to convince me that it's the best solution to the problem.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. sep Ipod+touch+2g+3g+; sep Ipod+touch+2g+3g+4g. AppleKrate. Sep 19, 08:58 AM. It#39;s not quite 0700 Cupertino time - so
  • ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. sep Ipod+touch+2g+3g+; sep Ipod+touch+2g+3g+4g. AppleKrate. Sep 19, 08:58 AM. It#39;s not quite 0700 Cupertino time - so



  • cmaier
    Apr 19, 06:16 PM
    After reading some of the lawsuit, I had to post this..



    Proof that Samsung ripped off Apple's rip off of Delicious Library?





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. Jailbreak iPod Touch 2G / iPod
  • Jailbreak iPod Touch 2G / iPod



  • Evangelion
    Jul 15, 10:37 AM
    1) This is all rumour and speculation...
    2) At the price that OEMs charge for memory, less RAM is better. We can fill it with whatever we pick.

    Let's see.... If I could choose between two identical compter, one having 512MB of RAM and costing $1799, and the other having 1GB of RAM and costing $1799, I should buy the one with less RAM because then I could "pick my own RAM"?

    And do I have to remind you that Woodcrests use FB-DIMM RAM, and those aren't really available that widely yet.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. for iPod Touch 2G 3G
  • for iPod Touch 2G 3G



  • Hugh
    Apr 27, 05:41 PM
    The bigger deal here is the tendency of some fathers to name their kids the EXACT same name they have and add a "2nd". I've always thought that practice couldn't be stupidier. :P

    I have a friend was name that way. Instead of putting JR in he puts II in.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. iPod Touch 2G, iPhone 3G,
  • iPod Touch 2G, iPhone 3G,



  • sukanas
    Apr 25, 01:36 PM
    money grubbers





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. ipod touch 2g and 3g
  • ipod touch 2g and 3g



  • dextertangocci
    Jul 27, 10:21 AM
    Can I swop the Merom with the Yonah in my MB?





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. difference between ipod touch
  • difference between ipod touch



  • Lord Blackadder
    Mar 21, 03:25 PM
    It's hard to argue against sysiphus's summary. The depressing corollary to that is, I don't see any realistically electable candidates on the horizon who can improve on Obama. Presidents have become more alike over time. Perhaps that is because the US is so out of step with the rest of the world that all presidents find themselves involved in similar international adventures.

    It will be interesting to see how Obama handles the next phase of the the situation, as he has promised to "tone down" US military involvement in Libya. Unlike Iraq, there is an opposition movement in-country and there is no invasion. So while I'm disappointed that we are involved in yet another conflict in the middle east, this one stands a better chance of aiding a legitimate opposition movement in removing a dictator rather than creating another tragic, expensive mess.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. difference between ipod touch
  • difference between ipod touch



  • Reach9
    Apr 11, 02:35 PM
    Why would you when android has at the moment passed apple on every standard out there?

    Android hasn't passed Apple on every standard. Please give me an example of that.

    But, Android phones are better smartphones than the iPhone, imo.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. The most clear difference
  • The most clear difference



  • applefan289
    Apr 6, 01:36 PM
    :apple:

    That's all I have to say.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. ipod touch 2g and 3g. for Ipod
  • ipod touch 2g and 3g. for Ipod



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 9, 11:12 AM
    I thought the 320m was also integrated? Wouldn't that mean that would be your only graphics card were nvidia allowed to add them to sandy bridge? I don't see why you would have integrated intel hd 3000 along with an integrated 320m (or successor).


    Why not ? A 320m successor would just destroy the Intel HD 3000 which is sub-par compared to the current 320m. Why not use 2 IGPs and go for a 2 chip solution instead of using a dedicated GPU and have to rely on a 3 chip solution if that 2nd IGP just blows away the first ?

    Heck, just disable the Intel 3000 HD entirely.

    Intel got greedy.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. ipod touch 2g and 3g. case,
  • ipod touch 2g and 3g. case,



  • rmwebs
    Mar 26, 04:54 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

    This might explain the shambles that is 10.6.7.

    Last release before Lion - semi-brick your machine to force an upgrade.

    iOS 4.3, last release before iPhone 5 - murder your battery to force an upgrade.

    You've guessed it, I'm not very happy with Apple at the moment. So which is it; underhand tactics, sloppy Q&A or declining standards?

    Probably all three ;) The QA team has gradually got worse and worse over the last few years. Apple have become more and more greedy, and you can bet the Mac OS coders cant be bothered to work on its ancient codebase when across the office a group of people get to play with the newer (granted still based on Mac OS) iOS.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. for iPod Touch 2G amp; 3G
  • for iPod Touch 2G amp; 3G



  • braddouglass
    Apr 6, 02:48 PM
    That is highly limited thinking. It might be time to open your mind and learn how and why other people might actually want a particular feature rather than assume that they are the person who is limited.

    I, and many others, use our computers for way more than typing.

    A simple example is when I use my MBPro on stage with any number of apps for musical performances.

    Also the sound engineers use MBPro for audio cues,audio mixing, recording, effects processing. The lighting guys use them.

    When you are heavily involved in multitasking you need to be able to see something, identify it and use it, all within a fraction of a second. You are not sitting there touch typing.


    THANK YOU!!!!! That's precisely why I need A back light and no one will understand haha but you get it my friend.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. ipod touch 2g 3g 4g. ipod
  • ipod touch 2g 3g 4g. ipod



  • Lesser Evets
    Mar 26, 08:21 AM
    Please release OS X Lion on a cool Apple flash drive :cool:

    Seriously. When will this optical media finally begin to die?

    You can buy a 4GB flash drive for under $4 these days. I'm sure Apple can work that into the price of the OS for another $2 or so. When flash drives of 4GB are under $1, I expect an exodus from these mechanical pieces of junk.

    Lion will be just a mere touch of make-up and a few changes towards making the experience of the newest and most profitable business of Apple... AppStore.

    I haven't seen anything in the preview of Lion that comes close to being a necessary addition or even a "wow". So I agree with you: it's a way to sell Apps better. Their OS'x have been disappointing for years. I will probably end any new OS purchases with Snow Leopard, until I get a new computer in 4 years.





    ipod touch 2g and 3g difference. ipod touch 2g and 3g
  • ipod touch 2g and 3g



  • shadowfax
    Jul 27, 04:13 PM
    Well it's back to the future for all of us. Remember when the Mac was going 64-bit with the introduction of the G5 PowerMac on June 23, 2003? :rolleyes: Only more thanthree years later and we're doing it all over again thanks to Yonah's 7 month retrograde.

    This may be a bit of a disappointment, but I think that Merom is still in the "past:" merom is not a 64-bit chip. None of these Core 2's are. They just have EM64T (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EM64T), which allows them to address more than 4 GB of memory directly. These are not true 64-bit processors like the G5--that is, the Core 2 Duo won't work with 64-bit applications. The G5's Intel counterpart would, I think, bit the Itanium chip, based on intel's IA-64 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-64) Architecture, which is truly 64 bit in every way. Merom simply contains a 64-bit extension to the IA-32 (x86) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_architecture#64-bit) architecture, which I understand is still a 32-bit architecture. We're not out of the woods yet...





    jholzner
    Aug 7, 06:00 PM
    Time Machine won't mean much when the HD fails. Back that azz up!

    I keep reading stuff like this. I don't think Time Machine works with the reagular harddrive. You have to use it with an external drive.





    ChrisA
    Aug 7, 06:43 PM
    Probably the same way it is in scalable transactional databases that use multi-versioning concurrency protocols (e.g. PostgreSQL and Oracle). No data is over-written, and every "update" actually creates a new record version.

    Lots of ways it COULD be implemented. Looks at Suns new file system ZFS. It is basically "Copy on Write". With a file system you can do things even fancier then with a DBMS. For example a "block" (i-node) exists physicaly on the disk only once but it could be maped into any numbr of files. If a file in only an orderd set of block numbers then to copy a copy all you need to copy is the set of numbers which is on the order of 1000 times shorter then the data itself.

    But on the other hand you _want_ the data to be physically copied if it is to be backed up to an external drive.

    Some time ago Apple was talking with Sun about using ZFS in OSX but I don't think anything came out of it. I suspect Apple wrote this themselves

    The problem is not that I can't figure out how Apple did this but that I can think of about a half dozen ways they could have done this.





    THX1139
    Aug 19, 07:34 PM
    ... For anyone out there who has been needlessly influenced by this guy to wait for a system that will only be outdated by the one that will come after it, please uninfluence yourself, and buy the stupid computer that you want, when you want it.

    Jeeshh!!

    I agree. I'm noticing a trend. People who are looking at the Macpro in a negative way come in three flavors. The first type are invested in G5 (especially quad) and are desperately trying justify that their investment is sound, when they actually desire a Macpro. They can feel better about their old machines by making the new ones seem bad. The are almost "smug" about waiting until a better one comes out. The second flavor are people who hate the Mac culture and are pissed that the Mac is catching up to the windows workstation sector. The third type are people who can't afford a Macpro and go out of their way to publicly discredit the machine so that they can feel good about their iMacs or Minis. There are others, but you get the point.

    I also find it amusing when I see posters participating in Macpro discussions when they have publicly stated that they have no intention of buying a Macpro. WTF?? Don't they have a life outside of macrumors? If I owned a G5 Quad and had no intention of buying a Macpro, I'd be spending all of my spare time doing cool stuff with my machine... instead of wasting that time participating in discussions that have nothing to do with me. I might read though some of the threads now and then, just to keep up with technology - but to particpate and debate, what a waste. I guess some folks have no life.





    Multimedia
    Jul 21, 04:42 PM
    Intel's Bensley platform was designed for Dempsey, Woodcrest, and Clovertown families of Xeon processors. So the system components like mobo and memory will remain the same. Any changes will be incremental.

    Of course things like Blue Ray and 802.11n may not be offered in the next release but only in Rev 2. Or, they will be cheaper.Interesting. You know links where we can learn more about Bensley?I know you already have a quad-core PowerMac so it makes sense for you to wait .... unless SJ is able to tempt you come WWDC with promise of 2x performance etc. ... :D :DI don't think 2x performance would impress me enough. It's not so much the increase in "performance" as it is the number of cores I care about - definitly waiting for 8 then 16. And there's also the Leopard onboard factor I would like to wait for. And Santa Rosa in the MacBook Pro.





    GregA
    Mar 26, 08:06 PM
    does anyone else thing launchpad is the worst idea yet?

    I did, until I saw why they were doing it.

    On the iPad or Mac, whatever you're doing you'll be able to pinch your 5 fingers together (or press the home button on iPad or iPhone) and it'll bring up your apps so you can launch something else. It's just a consistency thing.

    He was being that literal: "Step 2 may very well be the one & only Apple OS - based on iOS." This is absurd. Obviously OS X is taking cues from iOS. As you say, they've said so. But that's all that they are doing.

    Well, cues in the interface, and the same underlying OS. That's all it is for now. Mac OSX has a lot of extra options.

    (Now, might a Mac at some point use iOS in some way? Sure. Imagine a trackpad that was basically an iPod touch, or being able to fold our MacBook screens flat, which would boot iOS and turn it into an iPad. I'm sure Apple has some interesting things cooking in their labs. But OS X as we know it isn't disappearing.)

    There's a group of doom and gloom people on these boards that believe OS X will go away and we'll have one OS which we'll poking at our screens with no access to the underlying file system and we'll have to start jailbreaking our Macs. This line of thinking is idiotic.

    iOS has to grow up, especially with respect to File Management. I think iOS 5 will go a long way in this area.

    Once we get to iOS 6 I think we may start seeing iOS as the default Mac OS, with an optional OSX install (like X11 is) that extends it to do everything we expect from OSX (access to the file systems etc., perhaps even required for installation of non-app store programs). It may even be something where someone with "administrator" privileges gets the OSX add ons, while standard users do not.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment